Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacy of a combined regimen of misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for early 2nd-trimester pregnancy termination.
METHODS:
This is a prospective study that includes 79 pregnant women who requested legal termination of 2nd-trimester pregnancy between 13 and 22 weeks. Two regimens of misoprostol were used. Group 1: 400 microg of oral plus 400 microg vaginal misoprostol every 8 h (combined regimen) and group 2: 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 h up to a maximum of five doses (vaginal regimen).
RESULTS:
The induction-to-abortion interval was significantly longer in group 1 (25.5 +/- 24.45 h) than in group 2 (15 +/- 7.14 h) (p = 0.016). The abortion rate within 24 h in group 1 was of 56.8 vs. 85.7% in group 2 (p = 0.006). The hazard rate for vaginal delivery within 24 h was found to be 2.277-fold greater in the group with the combined therapy once controlled for plausible confounders.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our study suggests that oral misoprostol combined with vaginal misoprostol does not reduce the induction-to-abortion interval compared to an exclusively vaginal route when used for early 2nd-trimester pregnancy termination.
Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Year: 2005
Journal: Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
PMID: 16260893